Call or WhatsApp +91 96259 61599 advocates@legals365.com Private law firm website, not the official CAT website
Central Administrative Lawyer, B.K. Singh & Associates

MACP Withdrawn Because You Refused Promotion: Is That Correct?

MACP withdrawn or refused because you declined a promotion? What para 25 of the MACP Scheme says, when withdrawal and recovery are wrong, and what to do.

Pay & PromotionBy Advocate B.K. SinghUpdated 30 October 202618 min read

MACP Withdrawn Because You Refused Promotion: Is That Correct?

In short. MACP after refusal of promotion depends on timing. If you refused a regular promotion before your MACP fell due, the scheme lets the department deny the upgradation. If the MACP had already been granted and you refused a promotion later, para 25 of the scheme says the refusal is not a ground to withdraw it; it only defers your next MACP. This guide is for central employees whose MACP has been withdrawn or refused for this reason. A representation usually takes two to six months. Reply in writing before any recovery begins.

सारांश (हिंदी में)पदोन्नति से इनकार करने पर MACP का क्या होगा, यह समय पर निर्भर है। अगर आपने MACP की देय तारीख से पहले नियमित पदोन्नति ठुकराई, तो योजना के अनुसार MACP नहीं मिलता। लेकिन अगर MACP पहले ही मिल चुका था और बाद में आपने पदोन्नति से इनकार किया, तो MACP योजना के पैरा 25 के अनुसार उसे वापस नहीं लिया जा सकता; केवल अगला MACP डिबारमेंट की अवधि तक टलता है। यह गाइड उन केंद्रीय कर्मचारियों के लिए है जिनका MACP इस कारण वापस लिया गया या रोका गया। लिखित प्रतिवेदन पर फैसला आमतौर पर दो से छह महीने में होता है। वसूली शुरू होने से पहले लिखित जवाब दें।

Is this your situation?

  • You received your second or third MACP, later declined a promotion, and now the MACP has been cancelled.
  • A recovery has been ordered of the MACP pay you drew since the upgradation.
  • You refused a promotion some years ago and your MACP at 10, 20 or 30 years has been denied because of it.
  • You declined only an ad hoc or officiating arrangement, and the office is treating it as refusal of promotion.
  • You did not reply to a willingness letter, and the office has recorded that you refused.
  • You refused because of a family illness or a child's schooling and wrote the reasons down.
  • Your debarment period has ended and the office still will not consider you for the next MACP.

In short

  • Check the dates first. Note when your MACP became due and when you refused the promotion. Which came first decides almost everything.
  • An MACP already granted should not be withdrawn for a later refusal. Para 25 of the scheme says so in terms.
  • A later refusal does have a cost. You are not considered for the next MACP until you are willing to be promoted again, and the next one is deferred by the period of debarment.
  • A refusal before the due date can block the MACP. The scheme treats you as not stagnated, because promotion was offered.
  • Ask what exactly was 'refused'. Declining an ad hoc posting, missing an examination or not answering a letter may not be refusal of a regular promotion.
  • Contest any recovery separately. Even where the MACP was wrongly paid, Rafiq Masih limits recovery from Group C staff and retirees.

What the MACP Scheme actually says about refusing promotion

The Department of Personnel and Training brought in the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme by an OM dated 19 May 2009. An employee who stays in one grade without promotion gets a step up in pay after 10 years, again after 20 and once more after 30, each time to the next level of the pay matrix rather than to the next post in his hierarchy. The thinking behind it is stagnation: the upgradation compensates for promotion that did not come.

Para 25 of the scheme, repeated in the DoPT's own answers to frequently asked questions, deals with refusal. In substance it says three things. If a regular promotion was offered and refused before the employee became entitled to a financial upgradation, no upgradation is to be allowed, because he has not stagnated for lack of opportunity. If the upgradation was already allowed because of stagnation and the employee later refuses promotion, that is not a ground to withdraw the upgradation. And in that second case he is not eligible for further upgradation until he agrees to be considered for promotion again, with the next upgradation deferred by the period of debarment.

So on MACP after refusal of promotion, the scheme itself draws a clear line between a refusal that comes before the upgradation and one that comes after. A department that cancels an MACP granted earlier because of a refusal made later is acting against the words of the scheme it is applying. That is the first thing to put in your reply.

Where a department has gone wrong, it is usually because the establishment section read only the first sentence of para 25, or because it treated the date of the screening committee or the order as the date of entitlement instead of the date the MACP actually became due.

MACP after refusal of promotion: before or after makes the difference

QuestionRefusal before the MACP was dueRefusal after the MACP was granted
Can MACP be given or kept?No, under para 25, while the refusal operatesYes; it cannot be withdrawn for the refusal
Effect on the next MACPThe current one is itself in questionNot considered until you are willing again; deferred by the debarment period
Can the office recover money?Only if paid by mistake, and subject to Rafiq MasihNo basis for recovery, as the MACP was correctly held
Your main argumentWhat was offered was not a regular promotion, or the refusal was not yoursPara 25 and the DoPT FAQ forbid withdrawal
Typical outcome of a well-made representationSometimes reconsidered; often needs the tribunalUsually corrected within a few months

How the dates decide your case

The date of entitlement to MACP is the date you complete 10, 20 or 30 years of regular service and meet the benchmark, not the date a screening committee happens to meet. Committees often sit months late and grant upgradations with retrospective effect. If your MACP became due on 1 April 2022 and the committee met in November 2022, your entitlement date is still April.

That matters if a promotion offer arrived in between. Suppose the offer came in August 2022 and you declined. On paper the order granting MACP may be dated after your refusal, but your entitlement had already arisen in April. The refusal came after entitlement, and para 25's second sentence protects you.

The date of refusal also needs checking. The relevant date is when you actually declined a regular promotion offered to you, usually by a written letter or a failure to join within the time given in the promotion order. It is not the date the office later recorded a debarment.

Make a simple timeline: the date of joining the grade, the MACP due date, the date of the screening committee, the date of the MACP order, the date of the promotion offer, and the date and form of your refusal. Most of these cases are won or lost on that one page.

What counts as refusing a promotion, and what may not

  • A written refusal of a regular promotion. This is the clearest case. If you wrote that you did not want the promotion, para 25 applies.
  • Not joining after a regular promotion order. Failing to take charge within the time allowed is usually treated as refusal, especially if you did not ask for more time.
  • Declining an ad hoc or officiating arrangement. Para 25 speaks of a regular promotion. Declining a stop-gap ad hoc posting or a current duty charge is arguably not the refusal the scheme has in mind; check the order that was offered.
  • Not appearing in a departmental examination. Choosing not to sit for a limited competitive examination is not the same as refusing a promotion that was offered to you. Seniority-cum-fitness promotion and examination quotas are different routes.
  • Silence after a willingness letter. Some offices treat a missing reply as refusal. Unless the letter said in plain words that silence would be treated as refusal, this is open to challenge.
  • Asking for deferment for a stated period. A request to join after a child's board examination, for example, is not always a refusal. Whether the office accepted it as a deferment or recorded it as refusal is a question of the papers.

Debarment and MACP: how they fit together

Refusing a promotion has its own consequence under the DoPT's instructions on promotion: you are generally not considered for that promotion again for a period, usually one year from the refusal, and your seniority position may be affected when you are eventually promoted. Our page on debarment after declining a promotion explains that period and how it is counted.

For MACP, para 25 links the two. While you are debarred, you cannot be considered for the next MACP, and once you become willing again, the next MACP is pushed back by the length of the debarment. If your third MACP would have fallen due on 1 March 2028 and your debarment ran for one year, it would ordinarily become due on 1 March 2029, provided you have signalled willingness and meet the benchmark.

Debarment does not reach backwards. It cannot be used to take away an MACP already granted, and it does not lengthen the period for the MACP you already have.

Once the debarment ends, write to the office stating that you are willing to be considered for promotion. Keep a copy. Without that letter, many offices continue to treat you as unwilling and keep your name out of the next MACP screening, sometimes for years.

Refusal before the MACP was due: is the denial always final?

If you declined a regular promotion before your MACP fell due, the department's position has the support of the scheme's first sentence. The honest answer is that a challenge here is harder, and you should not expect the same result as in the 'after' case.

There are still points worth checking. Was the post offered a regular promotion in your hierarchy, or an ad hoc or out-of-cadre arrangement? Was the refusal in your own hand, or recorded by the office from a phone call? Did you later accept a promotion, and if so, from when? Tribunals have taken different views on whether the bar lasts indefinitely or only so long as the refusal and debarment operate; the answer may depend on the facts and on the bench.

If your refusal was long ago and you have since been willing, ask in writing that your case be considered for MACP from the end of the debarment period. Even if the office refuses, the request creates a date from which a later claim can run. For a broader check of your MACP record before you write, see our MACP checklist before you complain.

Challenging an MACP withdrawal step by step

These steps assume your MACP was granted and later withdrawn, or is being questioned, because of a refusal.

  1. Get the order and its basis

    Ask in writing for the withdrawal order, any show cause notice, the note or audit objection relied on, and the papers showing your refusal. If you were never given a notice before the withdrawal, record that.

  2. Build the timeline

    Set out the MACP due date, the screening committee date, the MACP order, the promotion offer and your refusal. Attach a copy of each.

  3. Reply to the show cause notice in time

    If you have a notice, answer it within the time given. Quote para 25 and the DoPT FAQ in your reply, and say that your refusal came after the MACP was due.

  4. Contest the recovery on its own

    Say that recovery is not permissible because the MACP was correctly granted, and in any case is barred for Group C staff and retirees under Rafiq Masih. Ask that recovery be kept in abeyance until your reply is decided.

  5. Represent upward if refused

    Send a representation to the next higher authority through proper channel. Keep the diary number and the date.

  6. Approach the tribunal if needed

    Once the representation is rejected, or six months pass in silence, the next step is an Original Application before the Central Administrative Tribunal. Where money is already being cut each month, the application should seek a stay of those deductions when it is first heard.

Advocate B.K. Singh asks first for the screening committee minutes along with the MACP order. The minutes show the date from which the committee found you entitled, and in many withdrawal cases that date is earlier than the refusal by months. That single page often decides the matter.

The rules and judgments in play

Para 25, MACP Scheme (DoPT OM of 19 May 2009)

Refusal of a regular promotion before entitlement bars the upgradation; refusal after grant is not a ground to withdraw it, but bars further upgradation until the employee is willing again and defers the next one by the period of debarment.

DoPT FAQ on MACPS

Repeats the same position on refusal before and after the upgradation, and is often the clearest document to attach to your reply.

DoPT instructions on refusal of promotion

Debarment from promotion, usually for one year from the refusal, with effect on seniority. Check the current OM, because the details have been revised over time.

State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih (2015)

The Supreme Court listed situations in which an employer may not claw back money it overpaid by its own error; lower-grade staff, pensioners and people near retirement are the main beneficiaries. DoPT circulars since 2016 tell departments to follow it.

High Court of Punjab and Haryana v. Jagdev Singh (2016)

An undertaking given at the time of pay fixation to refund any excess can permit recovery. Check whether you signed one at the time of MACP.

Sections 19, 20 and 21, Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985

An Original Application after departmental remedies or six months' wait, generally within one year of the final order, with power to condone delay for sufficient cause.

A made-up example: a senior tax assistant in Nagpur

Here's a made-up example. Pradeep, 51, is a senior tax assistant in an income tax office in Nagpur. He completed 20 years of regular service on 1 June 2021 and received his second MACP to the next pay level. The screening committee met in January 2022, and the order was issued in February 2022 with effect from 1 June 2021.

In September 2023 he was offered regular promotion to a post in another city. His wife was undergoing treatment in Nagpur, and he declined in writing. In 2025, during an inspection, the office decided that his refusal disqualified him from MACP, withdrew the second MACP from June 2021 and ordered recovery of about Rs 1.9 lakh in monthly instalments.

Pradeep replied to the notice with a timeline: MACP due June 2021, committee January 2022, refusal September 2023. He quoted para 25 and the DoPT FAQ, and added that he was a Group C employee and the recovery covered payments made long before the order. Within four months the office withdrew its order and refunded the two instalments already cut. It recorded that he was debarred for one year from September 2023, and that his third MACP would be deferred by that year.

Had Pradeep refused the promotion in 2020, before his MACP was due, his position would have been much weaker. He would have needed to show that the offer was not a regular promotion or that the refusal was not his, and the recovery question would then have turned on Rafiq Masih and on whether he had signed an undertaking.

Papers to collect

About your MACP

  • The MACP order with the date of effect
  • Screening committee minutes, obtained by request or RTI
  • Your pay fixation statement on MACP
  • Any undertaking you signed at the time of fixation

About the promotion and refusal

  • The promotion order or offer, showing whether it was regular, ad hoc or officiating
  • Your refusal letter, or proof of how the office recorded the refusal
  • Any letter accepting your request for deferment
  • Your later letter of willingness, with the date it was received

About the withdrawal and recovery

  • The show cause notice and the withdrawal order
  • The audit or inspection note relied on
  • Pay slips showing deductions
  • Your reply and representation with proof of submission

MACP recovery: a separate fight

Whenever there is an MACP withdrawal, a recovery order usually follows close behind. Treat it as a separate issue. If the withdrawal itself is wrong under para 25, the recovery falls with it. If the withdrawal is right, the recovery may still be barred.

Rafiq Masih protects you if you hold a Group C or D post, have already retired or will retire within twelve months, or if the money was paid more than five years before anyone ordered it back. It also protects anyone for whom repayment would be plainly unfair given the amount and their circumstances. The picture changes if, when the MACP pay was fixed, you signed a form promising to refund any excess; Jagdev Singh allows the department to rely on such a promise.

A recovery should not begin without notice and a chance to reply. If deductions started directly from your pay slip, raise that in your reply and ask that they be stopped. Our guide on the hardship exception for Group C employees covers the details, and our page on stopping a salary recovery explains when urgent relief is sought.

Advocate B.K. Singh's caution here is simple: do not sign any fresh undertaking or option form during the dispute without reading it twice. Offices sometimes send a revised fixation statement with a printed undertaking at the bottom, and signing it can weaken a recovery defence that was otherwise strong.

Time and cost at each stage

StageUsual timeCost and points to note
Reply to a show cause noticeWithin the time in the notice, often 15 daysNo fee; ask for more time in writing if you need documents
Decision on your replyOne to four monthsAsk that recovery be kept in abeyance meanwhile
Representation to the higher authorityDecision expected in up to six monthsNo fee; send through proper channel
Original Application to CATGenerally within one year of the final orderA small fixed fee, Rs 50 under Rule 7 of the CAT (Procedure) Rules; check the current amount with the registry
Interim stay of recoveryCan be sought at the first hearingGranted at the tribunal's discretion where the case is strong on its face
Final decision by CATOften one to two yearsArrears and refunds follow the order; implementation is usually allowed about three months

Where your case goes

For central government employees, including railway, postal and defence civilian staff, an MACP dispute is a service matter before the Central Administrative Tribunal. File at the bench that covers your place of posting or the office that passed the order; retired employees can usually file where they now live. Our CAT lawyer page explains how an application is put together.

If deductions have already started, ask for an interim order at the first hearing; our page on interim stays from CAT explains what the tribunal looks for. The broader MACP disputes, such as wrong level, benchmark refusals and counting of service, are covered on our MACP upgradation page.

Railway employees get MACP through Railway Board orders that broadly follow the DoPT scheme; check the railway version of the refusal clause before you write. CAPF personnel, who also receive MACP, generally go to the High Court rather than CAT. The armed forces have their own MACP scheme and the Armed Forces Tribunal. Public sector undertakings and banks run their own promotion and upgradation schemes, and para 25 does not apply to them.

Thinking of refusing a promotion? Points to weigh first

Many readers come to this question before the damage is done, with a promotion order in hand and a reason to stay where they are: an ageing parent, a spouse's job, a child in Class 10, a house loan tied to the city. Refusing is lawful. It is a choice the rules allow, and no one can be punished for it, though the rules on MACP after refusal of promotion still apply. But it has costs that are easy to underestimate.

First, count the years to your next MACP. If your 20-year or 30-year upgradation is due within the next year or two, a refusal now will push it back by the debarment period, and the loss in pay carries into your pension if you retire soon after. Second, check whether the promotion post is in a higher pay level than the MACP you already hold. If it is, refusing costs you real money every month; if it is not, the loss is mainly in future MACP timing.

Third, ask whether the office will accept a deferment instead of a refusal. A request to join a few months later, giving reasons, is sometimes accepted, and it does not carry the same consequences if the office records it as a deferment. Make the request before the joining deadline, and ask for the decision in writing.

Fourth, put any refusal in your own words and keep a copy. Say clearly what you are declining, the date of the order, and your reasons. Avoid vague letters that could be read as refusing all future promotions. A clean, dated refusal also fixes the start of the debarment period, which matters when you later write to say you are willing again.

If you joined a new post through direct recruitment and the office says your MACP count starts again, that is a different rule altogether; see our guide on MACP after direct recruitment to a new post. Refusal of promotion MACP cases also differ from benchmark disputes. If your MACP was refused because of an APAR grading, the benchmark rules apply; see MACP refused for APAR grading.

Some employees refuse a promotion because the MACP already placed them in the same pay level as the promotion post, so the promotion would bring a transfer without more pay. The refusal still has the effect para 25 describes: no withdrawal, but deferment of the next MACP. Weigh that before refusing, especially if your third MACP is a few years away.

Before filing anything, have your MACP fixation checked line by line. Our guide on how an MACP calculation is checked before filing sets out the method.

What to do this week

Write your timeline on one page. Find the MACP order, the promotion offer and your refusal. If a show cause notice has come, diary the last date for reply today. If deductions have already begun, write to the drawing and disbursing officer asking that they be stopped pending a decision on your reply.

If your MACP has been withdrawn or refused because of a refusal of promotion and you want the papers read before you reply, or want to stay informed about changes in the MACP rules, contact Advocate B.K. Singh.

Frequently asked questions

Can my MACP be taken back if I refuse a promotion later?

Not for that reason. Para 25 of the MACP Scheme says a refusal after the upgradation was granted is not a ground to withdraw it. The refusal only bars your next MACP until you are willing again and defers it by the debarment period.

I refused promotion before my 10-year MACP was due. Will I get it?

The scheme says no upgradation is allowed when a regular promotion was refused before entitlement. You may still check whether what you refused was truly a regular promotion and whether you can be considered after the debarment ends.

Is refusing an ad hoc promotion the same as refusing promotion?

Para 25 refers to a regular promotion. Declining an ad hoc or officiating arrangement is arguably different, but the office may see it otherwise, so check the exact order and take advice.

How long is the debarment after refusing promotion?

Usually one year from the refusal under DoPT instructions, though you should check the current OM. After it ends, write a letter of willingness so that you are considered again.

Can the office recover MACP pay from my salary?

If the MACP was wrongly withdrawn, there is no basis for recovery. Even where it was paid by mistake, recovery from Group C employees and retirees is restricted under Rafiq Masih, unless you signed an undertaking.

Is the date of the MACP order or the due date what counts?

The due date, that is, the date you completed the required years and met the conditions. A late screening committee does not shift your entitlement.

Can I go straight to CAT against an MACP withdrawal?

Ordinarily you should first reply to the notice and represent. If recovery has started or is about to, the tribunal can be approached earlier for an interim stay.

Does refusing promotion affect my pension?

Not directly. But a deferred third MACP can mean a lower last pay at retirement, which in turn affects pension, so weigh the timing before you refuse.

Advocate B.K. Singh

Advocate B.K. Singh

Founder of B.K. Singh & Associates. MCA, LL.B., LL.M. More than twenty years in practice before the Supreme Court, the Delhi High Court and other High Courts, the Central Administrative Tribunal and other tribunals. This guide was written and reviewed by his team.

This guide explains the law in general terms and is not legal advice. For advice on your own papers, contact the team.

Have a service dispute with the department?

Share the order, charge memo or pension papers with our advocates. You will learn the time limit that applies to you and the step to take first.

Book Consultation Call +91 96259 61599
WhatsApp us